All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
In a sweeping change of process for visitors into the United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) recently proposed a new digital disclosure requirement that would mandate visitors to hand over five years of social media history upon entering the country.
While the policy isn’t exactly a “new” idea, as it relates to reviewing social media histories at the border, it does create a renewed interest in our own digital footprints, social media retention, and understanding the limits of what a government can and should require for visitors.
So how comfortable are Americans with the government handling their social meda data, and how many are in favor of social media monitoring for immigrants into the U.S.? We surveyed 1,000 Americans to find out.
Understanding more about social media requirement
Bottom line
Majority of Americans oppose social media monitoring for immigration eligibility
The idea of social media monitoring surfaced more prevalently in early 2025 as part of campaign promises related to immigration during the presidential election. In response, we asked 1,000 U.S. adults what they thought of CBP agents using social media monitoring to determine immigration and visa eligibility.
Overall, 61% (more than 6 in 10) Americans oppose governmental monitoring of social media accounts to determine eligibility for things like green cards, visas, and immigration benefits.
Though monitoring has been available to CBP agents for immigration purposes, this is the first time that a policy requiring mandatory disclosure of social media profiles is being considered surrounding “Visa Waiver Program” countries, a group of countries that allow U.S. entry without a visa for up to 90 days. Visa Waiver Program countries include the UK, Australia, and about 40 other (mostly-European) countries.
Understanding more about social media requirement for immigration
The proposed policy, targeted at visitors from “visa-free” countries — countries that don’t require a visa for a 90-day U.S. stay, mandates 5 years of social media history for anyone entering from one of these countries, as well as “high-value data fields” for these individuals, including:
- Telephone numbers used in the last 5 years;
- Email addresses used in the last 10 years;
- IP addresses and metadata from electronically submitted photos;
- Family member names, telephone numbers, and dates of birth;
- Business data, and;
- Biometric data, including face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris images.
While some of these requirements are in place for some countries’ visitors, these proposed changes would apply to “Visa Waiver Program” countries: those that allow 90-day entry without a visa. This includes more than 40 countries, including:
- Andorra
- Australia
- Austria
- Belgium
- Brunei
- Chile
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Monaco
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Qatar
- San Marino
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- South Korea
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- United Kingdom
This proposal has not become policy yet. It’s currently under a 60-day commentary period, as it’s being considered.
Bottom line
While regulations related to social meda may be in flux, taking care of your own digital footprint and maintaining safe and secure web browsing should always be top of mind. Here’s how you can start:
- Find the best data removal tools. See which data removal services stand out for automating opt-outs, offering strong privacy features, and helping you wipe your data from the web.
- Learn how to keep yourself and your data hidden online. There are steps you can take to stay anonymous online, and learning the best practices for achieving online anonymity can go a long way in keeping your personal data secure.
- Use a VPN to cover your digital tracks: The best VPNs help make your online activity private from your internet service provider and even the government.