All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can resume a voter-verification system that uses Social Security records to check whether people on state voter rolls are U.S. citizens.[1]
That means a state can upload your information for a citizenship check without asking you first. SAVE can check your Social Security record without your consent, and you may not learn about the search unless election officials need you to prove your citizenship.
In June, U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled that this use and disclosure of Social Security information violated federal privacy law. She also found that the agencies began using the expanded system before completing required public notice procedures.[2]
The Supreme Court has put her ruling on hold while the administration appeals.
The judge found that the data sharing broke the law
An outdated record can put your registration at risk
Your Social Security record can be used in a voter check
The system is called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE. Congress called for an immigration-status verification system in 1986, and the immigration service created SAVE in 1987 to help agencies check eligibility for certain public benefits. States later began using it for voter-registration checks.
The Trump administration expanded SAVE in 2025. Agencies can now upload records in bulk and search using full or partial Social Security numbers. Earlier searches generally required a DHS-issued immigration identifier, which people born in the U.S. don’t have.
When an agency submits someone’s information, the Social Security Administration (SSA) checks its records and sends results to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
According to the Supreme Court’s opinion, those results include the person’s full name, birth date, full Social Security number, and citizenship status. SAVE then sends the agency a verification response.
By May, at least 67 million voter registrations had gone through the expanded system, according to an Associated Press report published by PBS News.
The judge found that the data sharing broke the law
The Privacy Act restricts federal agencies from disclosing personally identifiable information without consent, subject to exceptions. One permits a use compatible with the purpose for which the information was collected.
Sooknanan found that the government hadn’t shown how collecting private information for Social Security purposes was compatible with using it for state voter checks.
Her ruling also found that the agencies violated the Social Security Act and failed to meet the Privacy Act’s notice requirements.
DHS and SSA launched the expanded system in May 2025, then published notices describing the new uses of the records in the fall. As Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in her dissent, “the modified SAVE system … had already been in operation since May.”
The Supreme Court’s six-justice majority concluded that a separate federal statute likely permits DHS to request and receive citizenship information despite the restrictions cited by the lower court.
Its decision allows the expanded system to operate during the appeal.
An outdated record can put your registration at risk
If SAVE can’t confirm someone’s citizenship, election officials may ask that person for proof. A state could cancel the registration if the voter doesn’t provide it. SAVE doesn’t make the final decision.
Federal law generally restricts systematic voter removals within 90 days of a federal election. The Supreme Court said that limits the immediate effect of its decision, though individual inquiries can still occur.
You can’t opt out of an election agency’s SAVE query. You can check your registration through your state’s election website.
Use an official election page when you do: as our reporting on VoteSafe found, a private voter-checking site can collect your information without giving you a live view of the state’s records.
If you’ve become a U.S. citizen, SSA also explains how to update your citizenship status in its records.