All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
Personal data is more vulnerable than ever in today’s digitized world, with personal details and information residing in countless online repositories. When that information is accessed by criminals through data breaches, digital leaks, or even old-school scams, the resulting identity theft can be difficult to recover from. While this kind of crime is unfortunately common across America, there are certain parts of the country where it is more widespread (and growing) than others.
To find where identity theft rose and fell the most last year, the All About Cookies research team analyzed FTC Consumer Sentinel Network data comparing 2025 and 2024 identity theft reports per 100,000 residents for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the country.
States with the biggest increase in identity theft
States where identity theft declined
Cities where identity theft rose the most
Cities where identity theft declined
Why identity theft is rising
Identity theft reports by state
Identity theft reports in the 100 largest cities
How to protect yourself from identity theft
Methodology
Key findings
- Identity theft reports per capita rose in 45 states and most major cities in 2025.
- Mississippi recorded the largest increase of any state, with identity theft reports per 100K jumping 53% year-over-year.
- Identity theft reports in Massachusetts dropped by 17.8%, the most of any state. Nowhere else in the country did ID theft drop by even 7.5% year-over-year.
- Baton Rouge, Louisiana, posted the largest increase of any city, with identity theft up 59.1% year over year.
- Miami, Florida, had the highest identity theft rate of any city in 2025, at 1,228 reports per 100K.
States with the biggest increase in identity theft
While consumer fraud reports declined across much of the country in 2025, identity theft moved sharply in the opposite direction for almost the entire country.
Mississippi's 53% surge in identity theft was the largest of any state, rising from 268 to 410 reports per 100,000 residents in a single year. No other state came close to that level of rate increase, as Florida saw the second-biggest jump at “just” 37.9%.
Illinois (+37.8%), Alabama (+37.2%), and Louisiana (+36.4%) round out the top five, and all saw increases well above the national average. The rest of the top 10 is made up of South Carolina (+35.1%), Alaska (+34%), Georgia (+33.7%), North Carolina (+33.6%), and Arkansas (+33.5%).
It is notable that eight of the top 10 states in terms of increased year-over-year identity theft reports are in the South, illustrating how big an issue this crime is becoming in that region. While the South in particular saw an influx of identity theft, per capita reports for the crime increased almost everywhere in America, rising in 45 different states. That kind of widespread growth illustrates how important identity theft protection is for users across the nation.
States with the biggest rise in identity theft in 2025
1. Mississippi
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 410
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +53.0%
2. Florida
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 728
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +37.9%
3. Illinois
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 467
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +37.8%
4. Alabama
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 369
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +37.2%
5. Louisiana
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 472
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +36.4%
States where identity theft declined
While identity theft reports rose in the vast majority of states, a handful of places saw declines last year.
Massachusetts stood out as the only state with a double-digit decline, dropping from 388 to 319 reports per 100,000 residents, a reduction of 17.8%. New Hampshire (-7.3%) and Rhode Island (-4.9%) also saw meaningful reductions. Maine (-2.4%), Montana (-2.3%), and Vermont (-2%) are the only other states where identity theft report rates fell.
Interestingly, New England accounted for five of the six states where identity theft fell, a regional trend that stands in opposition to the widespread and significant increases in the Southern region of the country.
States where identity theft fell most in 2025
1. Massachusetts
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 319
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -17.8%
2. New Hampshire
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 139
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -7.3%
3. Rhode Island
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 251
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -4.9%
4. Maine
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 124
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -2.4%
5. Montana
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 128
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -2.3%
Cities where identity theft rose the most
The surge in identity theft touched virtually every major U.S. metropolitan area in 2025, but some cities saw especially dramatic increases.
Many of the cities where identity theft increases were the most drastic were located in the American South, with the single largest surge coming in Jackson, Mississippi, where ID theft reports rose by more than 67% year-over-year. Tampa, Florida, was second with a 61% increase, with Baton Rouge, Louisiana (+59%), Columbia, South Carolina (+51%), and Memphis, Tennessee (+51%) rounding out a top five that is entirely composed of Southern locales.
Unfortunately, Southern representation at the top of the list doesn’t end there. 14 of the top 15 cities where identity theft reports increased the most last year are located in that part of the country, with Chicago, Illinois, in the 12th spot being the lone representative from elsewhere in the country.
Cities with the biggest rise in identity theft in 2025
1. Jackson, Mississippi
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 509
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +67.4%
2. Tampa, Florida
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 692
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +60.6%
3. Baton Rouge, Louisiana
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 840
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +59.1%
4. Columbia, South Carolina
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 496
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +51.2%
5. Memphis, Tennessee
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 620
- Change in per-capita identity theft: +51.2%
Cities where identity theft declined
Only a handful of major metros bucked the trend in 2025, and most were in New England, making that part of the country the opposite of the South when it comes to identity theft.
Worcester, Massachusetts, saw the biggest single drop in ID theft reports, declining by more than 20% from 2024 to 2025. Nearby Boston was second, falling by 17%, while Providence, Rhode Island, saw the third-largest decrease at nearly 14%.
Outside of New England, year-over-year identity theft report rates fell in only three other major metropolitan areas. Rates fell by 9% in Spokane, Washington, 4% in Ogden, Utah, and nearly 3% in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Cities where identity theft fell most in 2025
1. Worcester, Massachusetts
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 237
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -20.2%
2. Boston, Massachusetts
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 335
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -17.3%
3. Providence, Rhode Island
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 280
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -13.6%
4. Spokane, Washington
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 163
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -9.4%
5. Ogden, Utah
- Identity theft reports per 100,000 people: 133
- Change in per-capita identity theft: -4.3%
Why identity theft is rising
The broad national increase in identity theft reports reflects several converging trends:
- A surge in government benefits fraud, including fraudulent unemployment claims and tax refund theft
- Expansion of digital financial services that create new vectors for account takeover
- Large-scale data breaches in 2023 and 2024 that made more personal data available to criminals
- Increased use of AI-generated synthetic identities and deepfake-assisted fraud schemes
- An increased criminal focus on gaining access to existing sources of personal data
The divergence from consumer fraud trends is particularly striking: even as overall fraud reports fell, identity theft climbed almost everywhere. This may reflect a shift in criminal tactics — moving away from broad consumer scams toward more targeted, identity-based crimes that are harder to detect and more damaging to victims when they occur.
Identity theft reports by state
Below is the full ranking of states by year-over-year change in identity theft reports per 100,000 residents.
| State | 2025 Reports per 100K | 2024 Reports per 100K | Year-Over-Year Change |
| Alabama | 369 | 269 | 37.2% |
| Alaska | 142 | 106 | 34.0% |
| Arizona | 323 | 287 | 12.5% |
| Arkansas | 279 | 209 | 33.5% |
| California | 408 | 356 | 14.6% |
| Colorado | 222 | 208 | 6.7% |
| Connecticut | 276 | 236 | 16.9% |
| Delaware | 454 | 392 | 15.8% |
| District of Columbia | 622 | 480 | 29.6% |
| Florida | 728 | 528 | 37.9% |
| Georgia | 691 | 517 | 33.7% |
| Hawaii | 143 | 138 | 3.6% |
| Idaho | 135 | 125 | 8.0% |
| Illinois | 467 | 339 | 37.8% |
| Indiana | 218 | 198 | 10.1% |
| Iowa | 127 | 123 | 3.3% |
| Kansas | 168 | 154 | 9.1% |
| Kentucky | 169 | 142 | 19.0% |
| Louisiana | 472 | 346 | 36.4% |
| Maine | 124 | 127 | -2.4% |
| Maryland | 402 | 324 | 24.1% |
| Massachusetts | 319 | 388 | -17.8% |
| Michigan | 284 | 237 | 19.8% |
| Minnesota | 158 | 127 | 24.4% |
| Mississippi | 410 | 268 | 53.0% |
| Missouri | 221 | 187 | 18.2% |
| Montana | 128 | 131 | -2.3% |
| Nebraska | 143 | 130 | 10.0% |
| Nevada | 543 | 466 | 16.5% |
| New Hampshire | 139 | 150 | -7.3% |
| New Jersey | 373 | 313 | 19.2% |
| New Mexico | 165 | 150 | 10.0% |
| New York | 352 | 295 | 19.3% |
| North Carolina | 346 | 259 | 33.6% |
| North Dakota | 142 | 119 | 19.3% |
| Ohio | 273 | 236 | 15.7% |
| Oklahoma | 195 | 169 | 15.4% |
| Oregon | 169 | 163 | 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania | 332 | 290 | 14.5% |
| Rhode Island | 251 | 264 | -4.9% |
| South Carolina | 393 | 291 | 35.1% |
| South Dakota | 102 | 94 | 8.5% |
| Tennessee | 275 | 212 | 29.7% |
| Texas | 508 | 393 | 29.3% |
| Utah | 165 | 157 | 5.1% |
| Vermont | 99 | 101 | -2.0% |
| Virginia | 235 | 213 | 10.3% |
| Washington | 193 | 169 | 14.2% |
| West Virginia | 124 | 113 | 9.7% |
| Wisconsin | 178 | 149 | 19.5% |
| Wyoming | 121 | 120 | 0.8% |
Identity theft reports in the 100 largest cities
Below is the full ranking of the 100 largest U.S. metro areas by year-over-year change in identity theft reports per 100,000 residents.
| Metro Area | 2025 Reports per 100K | 2024 Reports per 100K | Year-Over-Year Change |
| Akron, OH | 307 | 246 | 24.8% |
| Albany, NY | 204 | 190 | 7.4% |
| Albuquerque, NM | 175 | 170 | 2.9% |
| Allentown, PA-NJ | 343 | 279 | 22.9% |
| Atlanta, GA | 920 | 690 | 33.3% |
| Augusta, GA | 389 | 342 | 13.7% |
| Austin, TX | 416 | 317 | 31.2% |
| Bakersfield, CA | 311 | 277 | 12.3% |
| Baltimore, MD | 403 | 315 | 27.9% |
| Baton Rouge, LA | 840 | 528 | 59.1% |
| Birmingham, AL | 460 | 336 | 36.9% |
| Boise, ID | 159 | 148 | 7.4% |
| Boston, MA | 335 | 405 | -17.3% |
| Bridgeport, CT | 308 | 271 | 13.7% |
| Buffalo, NY | 212 | 194 | 9.3% |
| Cape Coral, FL | 518 | 344 | 50.6% |
| Charleston, SC | 449 | 341 | 31.7% |
| Charlotte, NC | 515 | 374 | 37.7% |
| Chattanooga, TN | 222 | 199 | 11.6% |
| Chicago, IL | 549 | 401 | 36.9% |
| Cincinnati, OH | 257 | 199 | 29.1% |
| Cleveland, OH | 376 | 328 | 14.6% |
| Colorado Springs, CO | 236 | 222 | 6.3% |
| Columbia, SC | 496 | 328 | 51.2% |
| Columbus, OH | 369 | 316 | 16.8% |
| Dallas, TX | 624 | 475 | 31.4% |
| Dayton, OH | 265 | 244 | 8.6% |
| Deltona, FL | 409 | 290 | 41.0% |
| Denver, CO | 255 | 237 | 7.6% |
| Des Moines, IA | 180 | 159 | 13.2% |
| Detroit, MI | 433 | 359 | 20.6% |
| Durham, NC | 293 | 227 | 29.1% |
| El Paso, TX | 300 | 224 | 33.9% |
| Fresno, CA | 344 | 276 | 24.6% |
| Grand Rapids, MI | 172 | 151 | 13.9% |
| Greensboro, NC | 315 | 241 | 30.7% |
| Greenville, SC | 311 | 267 | 16.5% |
| Harrisburg, PA | 241 | 207 | 16.4% |
| Hartford, CT | 262 | 228 | 14.9% |
| Honolulu, HI | 150 | 143 | 4.9% |
| Houston, TX | 707 | 573 | 23.4% |
| Indianapolis, IN | 304 | 312 | -2.6% |
| Jackson, MS | 509 | 304 | 67.4% |
| Jacksonville, FL | 461 | 364 | 26.6% |
| Kansas City, MO | 225 | 193 | 16.6% |
| Kiryas Joel, NY | 319 | 279 | 14.3% |
| Knoxville, TN | 176 | 153 | 15.0% |
| Lakeland, FL | 690 | 473 | 45.9% |
| Las Vegas, NV | 671 | 570 | 17.7% |
| Little Rock, AR | 445 | 350 | 27.1% |
| Los Angeles, CA | 632 | 550 | 14.9% |
| Louisville, KY | 240 | 195 | 23.1% |
| Madison, WI | 178 | 164 | 8.5% |
| McAllen, TX | 276 | 212 | 30.2% |
| Memphis, TN | 620 | 410 | 51.2% |
| Miami, FL | 1,228 | 903 | 36.0% |
| Milwaukee, WI | 326 | 248 | 31.5% |
| Minneapolis, MN | 189 | 150 | 26.0% |
| Nashville, TN | 277 | 219 | 26.5% |
| New Haven, CT | 308 | 249 | 23.7% |
| New Orleans, LA | 529 | 432 | 22.5% |
| New York, NY | 418 | 343 | 21.9% |
| North Port, FL | 337 | 320 | 5.3% |
| Ogden, UT | 133 | 139 | -4.3% |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 241 | 205 | 17.6% |
| Omaha, NE | 182 | 162 | 12.3% |
| Orlando, FL | 747 | 555 | 34.6% |
| Oxnard, CA | 279 | 219 | 27.4% |
| Palm Bay, FL | 362 | 298 | 21.5% |
| Philadelphia, PA | 514 | 456 | 12.7% |
| Phoenix, AZ | 381 | 338 | 12.7% |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 222 | 187 | 18.7% |
| Portland, OR | 190 | 181 | 5.0% |
| Providence, RI | 280 | 324 | -13.6% |
| Provo, UT | 161 | 150 | 7.3% |
| Raleigh, NC | 398 | 286 | 39.2% |
| Richmond, VA | 335 | 274 | 22.3% |
| Riverside, CA | 398 | 343 | 16.0% |
| Rochester, NY | 284 | 244 | 16.4% |
| Sacramento, CA | 329 | 269 | 22.3% |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 206 | 175 | 17.7% |
| San Antonio, TX | 403 | 302 | 33.4% |
| San Diego, CA | 353 | 313 | 12.8% |
| San Francisco, CA | 270 | 250 | 8.0% |
| San Jose, CA | 251 | 229 | 9.6% |
| Scranton, PA | 388 | 290 | 33.8% |
| Seattle, WA | 229 | 195 | 17.4% |
| Spokane, WA | 163 | 180 | -9.4% |
| St. Louis, MO | 306 | 258 | 18.6% |
| Stockton, CA | 332 | 260 | 27.7% |
| Syracuse, NY | 160 | 158 | 1.3% |
| Tampa, FL | 692 | 431 | 60.6% |
| Toledo, OH | 225 | 193 | 16.6% |
| Tucson, AZ | 245 | 204 | 20.1% |
| Tulsa, OK | 221 | 189 | 16.9% |
| Virginia Beach, VA | 297 | 263 | 12.9% |
| Washington, DC | 364 | 314 | 15.9% |
| Wichita, KS | 206 | 167 | 23.4% |
| Winston-Salem, NC | 251 | 187 | 34.2% |
| Worcester, MA | 237 | 297 | -20.2% |
How to protect yourself from identity theft
- Sign up for identity theft protection: The best identity theft protection services monitor your Social Security number, credit, and personal data across the dark web and financial systems — and help you recover if your identity is stolen.
- Consider a data removal service: Identity thieves often harvest personal information from data broker sites. The best data removal services reduce your digital footprint by removing your data from these databases.
- Use a password manager: Weak or reused passwords are a leading entry point for account takeover fraud. The best password managers generate and store strong, unique passwords for every account.
Methodology
To compile this report, the All About Cookies research team analyzed FTC Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book figures for 2024 and 2025, comparing fraud reports per 100,000 residents for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the country by population size. Metropolitan data is identified by the name of each metro’s primary city throughout this report. Year-over-year change reflects the percentage difference in per-capita identity theft reports between the two years.