All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
Your face could end up in a people-search database even if you never visited the site or agreed to be searched.
ClarityCheck, a reverse-lookup service that advertised its image searches as “private and secure,” left more than 9 million image files accessible online without authentication.[1]
The collection included photos of adults, teenagers, and children. Some of the people pictured may never have known that someone else uploaded their photos.
ClarityCheck has secured the database, and there is no public evidence that criminals downloaded it. However, the incident shows how little control you may have over where your face ends up online.
Someone else may have uploaded your face
How to protect your face online
Bottom line
What ClarityCheck exposed
Security researcher Jeremiah Fowler discovered a cloud database containing approximately 9,042,977 image files, totaling 450.2 GB.
The files appeared in folders labeled “faces” and “profiles.” Fowler’s limited review found profile pictures, screenshots, physical photographs, and other images of adults, teenagers, and children.
The database was stored in an Amazon S3 bucket that did not require a password or other authentication. Its address could be found in ClarityCheck’s publicly available website code.
ClarityCheck disputed that the files were “publicly exposed,” arguing that someone would need to know a specific, unindexed URL to access them. However, anyone who found that URL could reportedly view the files without signing in.
The 9 million figure represents image files, rather than 9 million confirmed victims. ClarityCheck said the database included duplicate, cropped, and resized versions of the same photos.
There is also no evidence that hackers stole the files or that ClarityCheck’s internal systems were breached. The company restricted access after being contacted about the findings.
Someone else may have uploaded your face
ClarityCheck allows users to upload a photo and search for information about the person shown.
The company requires uploaders to confirm that they have permission to share the image. That protection depends entirely on users telling the truth.
Someone could upload a screenshot from a dating profile, a social media picture, or even a scanned photograph. The person pictured may never know that ClarityCheck received or stored it.
When a WIRED reporter tested the service using their own face, the website said it was “scanning facial landmarks” and “mapping unique face geometry.” It offered a report that could include a name, addresses, location history, social media profiles, photos, videos, and “hidden dating profiles.”
A separate configuration problem also allowed ClarityCheck website addresses to be manipulated to reveal possible email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses associated with a name. The company secured that issue after being contacted.
Currently, there’s no indication that every exposed face was linked directly to contact information. Still, a real photo can help a scammer create convincing dating profiles, social media accounts, phishing messages, or impersonation schemes.
How to protect your face online
No public checker can confirm whether your photo appeared in the exposed database. That said, you can still reduce how easily strangers and people-search services can connect your face to your identity.
- Delete or suppress your ClarityCheck data: If you used the service, delete your account. You can also use its privacy center to request access, deletion, or suppression, even if you never created an account.
- Search for copies of your photos: Run your public profile pictures through Google Lens or TinEye, and search your name and usernames for unfamiliar profiles. Avoid uploading photos to unknown “free” lookup sites.
- Lock down public images: Review your social media and dating profile settings, remove abandoned accounts, and limit personal photos to trusted contacts. Parents should also check which pictures of their children are publicly visible.
- Prepare for impersonation scams: Create a family safe word for urgent requests involving money or account access, which can also help protect against AI voice-cloning scams.
- Document fake accounts: Save screenshots, usernames, profile links, messages, and timestamps before reporting an impersonator. If fraud or identity theft occurs, follow the recovery steps at IdentityTheft.gov.
Bottom line
ClarityCheck has restricted access to the exposed database, and no misuse has been confirmed. The larger privacy problem remains.
Someone else can upload your face to a service designed to identify you, potentially without your knowledge or permission. Reducing public photos, checking for impersonation, and requesting removal from people-search databases can help you regain some control.