Best Hostinger Alternatives 2025

Bluehost is the best Hostinger alternative for most users, offering superior performance, more features on entry-level plans, and better support for growing websites. While Hostinger delivers solid value at budget-friendly prices, alternatives like Bluehost, DreamHost, and Hosting.com each excel in specific areas that may better suit your needs.

Bluehost stands out with a CDN and staging sites included across all tiers. Plus, it supports up to 400,000 monthly visitors on its highest plan. DreamHost offers the most generous entry-level resources: 25 websites and 25 GB of NVMe storage on its tier-one plan.

For those on a tight budget, Hosting.com's ultra-low $1.99/mo starting rate and included email make it an attractive choice.

Keep reading to learn more about our experience with these top Hostinger alternatives.

The best Hostinger alternatives

Compare the best Hostinger alternatives

Best for	Best for budget-conscious users seeking solid basics	Best for higher-traffic sites and more entry-level features	Best for generous entry-level resources	Best for first-year savings and email
Star rating	4.9 AllAboutCookies writers and editors score products based on a number of objective features as well as our expert editorial assessment. Our partners do not influence how we rate products.	4.8 AllAboutCookies writers and editors score products based on a number of objective features as well as our expert editorial assessment. Our partners do not influence how we rate products.	4.9 AllAboutCookies writers and editors score products based on a number of objective features as well as our expert editorial assessment. Our partners do not influence how we rate products.	4.6 AllAboutCookies writers and editors score products based on a number of objective features as well as our expert editorial assessment. Our partners do not influence how we rate products.
Starting price	Starts at $2.99/mo	Starts at $2.99/mo	Starts at $2.89/mo	Starts at $1.99/mo
Money-back guarantee	Yes — 30 days	Yes — 30 days	Yes — 30 days	Yes — 30 days
Uptime guarantee	99.9%	99.99%	100%	99.9%
Monthly visits	25K - 200K	40K - 400K	40K - 400K	Unmetered
Number of websites	3 - 100	10 - 100	25 - 100	1 - 100
Storage	20 GB SSD - 100 GB NVMe	10 GB - 100 GB NVMe	25 GB - 100 GB NVMe	15 GB - 100 GB NVMe
Free SSL certificate	On all plans	On all plans	On all plans	On all plans
Free domain for a year	On all plans	On all plans	On all plans	On all plans
Free CDN	Starting from tier two	On all plans	No — must purchase	On all plans
Free staging	Starting from tier two	On all plans
Learn more	Get Hostinger Read Hostinger Review	Get Bluehost Read Bluehost Review	Get DreamHost Read DreamHost Review	Get Hosting.com Read Hosting.com Review

Bluehost: Best for high-traffic websites and features

What we liked

Higher monthly traffic limits: Bluehost’s highest-tier shared hosting plan supports up to 400,000 monthly visitors. To get the equivalent on Hostinger, you’d have to scale all the way up to its Cloud Enterprise plan.

Free CDN: If your site receives traffic from visitors outside your server's geographic location, a CDN can significantly improve loading speeds and performance. Unlike Hostinger, which does not include a CDN on its entry-level plan, Bluehost includes one on all plans.

WordPress staging: Hostinger does not include a staging environment on its entry-level plan. Bluehost does, giving it yet another advantage over Hostinger.

Phone support on higher plans: Bluehost offers 24/7 phone support on all plans except the entry-level plan. That’s in addition to 24/7 chat support. Hostinger does not offer phone support on any of its plans.

What we didn’t like

Advanced ecommerce tools restricted to its highest plan: Bluehost has a range of advanced tools to help launch and grow various types of online businesses. Unfortunately, it's only available on the tier-three plan. Given that the tier-two plan is a “Business” plan, it would be nice to see a limited release of the tools added to this plan as well.

Test results

To conduct our thorough hands-on testing of Bluehost’s web hosting, we first signed up for a plan and then built a mock website. Next, we went to Dotcom-Tools and ran a speed test from three locations. The test provided us with an overall performance score. It also gave us results for certain Google Core Web Vitals, including First Contentful Paint (FCP), which measures how long it takes for the first element on a web page to load, and Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), which tests how fast the largest element on a web page loads.

Bluehost received a flawless 100 overall score, with FCP coming in at 0.43 seconds, and LCP at 0.63 seconds — both far below Google’s recommended max thresholds of 1.8 seconds and 2.5 seconds, respectively.^[1][2] We also tested Bluehost’s uptime, and after 4 continuous days, it remained steady at 100%. For the final assessment, we sent 250 virtual visitors to our mock site in 1 minute to see how Bluehost’s shared servers would handle a traffic spike. The site experienced no errors and maintained an average response rate of 298 milliseconds.

Star rating summary

Beyond its exceptional performance results, Bluehost crushed it across several other categories, earning perfect scores in features and security, and a near-perfect score for support and reputation. When comparing Bluehost against Hostinger and other competitors, it’s easy to see why, as Bluehost has arguably the most complete feature set with strong security to match.

Bluehost’s promo pricing is higher than some other hosts', which slightly lowers its score in that area, but we think the extra cost is justifiable for what you get in return. Overall, we had a great experience using Bluehost.

DreamHost: Best entry-level plan for multiple sites

What we liked

Higher website and storage limits on entry-level plan: Of all the Hostinger alternatives, DreamHost has the most generous website and storage limits at the entry level: 25 websites with 25 GB of NVMe storage.

Daily backups: Hostinger’s entry-level plan offers only weekly backups. DreamHost gives you daily backups, regardless of which plan you’re on.

Handcrafted starter website: Both Hostinger and DreamHost include an AI website builder on all plans. This is a convenient way to launch a new site. However, DreamHost takes it a step further with its build-a-site-for-you service.

Better AI tools on entry-level plan: Hostinger’s tier-one plan includes an AI website builder, but its other AI tools are paywalled behind the tier-two Business plan. DreamHost provides similar tools, but makes them accessible on all plans.

What we didn’t like

No staging: Although Hostinger’s entry-level plan doesn’t offer staging either, it does add it on the tier-two Business plan, whereas none of DreamHost’s standard web hosting or WordPress hosting plans include it. You’d have to opt for the much pricier high-performance plans to unlock staging with DreamHost.

CDN is a paid add-on: DreamHost does not include a CDN on any of its standard plans. You must purchase it as an add-on or opt for one of its high-performance plans.

Phone support is a paid add-on: While Bluehost and Hosting.com include phone support on their plans, DreamHost charges extra for it. This feels unnecessary, though it’s still better than Hostinger, which doesn’t offer phone support.

Test results

We followed the same testing methodology on DreamHost that we conducted on Bluehost. For the speed test, Bluehost’s scores were better than DreamHost’s, though DreamHost still performed well. Its overall performance score came in at 97.67, with an average FCP of 0.63 seconds, and an average LCP of 1.17 seconds. Uptime remained flawless at 100% for over a week of monitoring.

The stress test is where DreamHost really shone compared to all other Hostinger alternatives and Hostinger itself. It not only handled 250 visitors in 1 minute without errors, but also maintained an average response time of only 9 milliseconds during the traffic surge. That is lightning-fast and shows that DreamHost’s servers can handle overloads.

The following table shows site performance throughout the testing period via Uptime Robot.

Star rating summary

Given DreamHost’s speed test scores and astonishing stress test results, it’s no surprise that it received a flawless 5/5 for performance. Its features and security were equally impressive, and support wasn’t too far behind either.

We particularly enjoyed using DreamHost’s AI chatbot. Every question we asked was answered promptly and succinctly. It was so effective that we never even had to connect with a human because we didn’t need to.

Overall, we found DreamHost’s prices to be fair, and we enjoyed testing it.

Hosting.com: Best for first-year savings and email

What we liked

Ultra-low first-year rate: If you’re short on funds, but need a reliable, feature-rich host, then Hosting.com’s entry-level plan — priced at only $1.99/mo — is your answer. Just be mindful of the renewal rate, because it does increase sharply.

Email with unlimited storage: Hostinger offers a free 1-year trial of its business email service, but after the year is over, you need to pay to continue using it. With Hosting.com, email is free indefinitely, and with generous limits, at that.

Enterprise CDN: All Hosting.com shared hosting plans include a CDN. Hostinger doesn’t unlock this feature until tier two.

Daily backups: Every Hosting.com shared hosting plan comes with daily backups. On Hostinger, the entry-level plan is limited to weekly backups.

What we didn’t like

Low website limits: Hosting.com is the only Hostinger alternative featured here that caps you at a single website on its entry-level plan. The tier-two plan raises it to only 2. It’s not until the third-tier plan that it jumps to a reasonable 10.

Unmetered monthly visitors: While it’s nice in theory, there is no such thing as true “unmetered” monthly visitors. If you sign up for Hosting.com’s entry-level plan and start getting 50,000 visitors per day, you’ll be asked to upgrade your plan. It would be helpful if Hosting.com provided an estimate rather than vague adjectives.

Test results

Once again, our testing process was identical. For speed, Hosting.com coincidentally received the same overall performance rating as DreamHost — 97.67. However, it scored moderately better on FCP and LCP, with 0.53 and 1.1 seconds, respectively.

For uptime, the site maintained a 99.989% rate over 8 days. Finally, on the stress test, Hosting.com experienced no errors during our traffic surge simulation and recorded an average response time of 164 milliseconds.

Star rating summary

Hosting.com delivered impressive results across most categories, earning perfect 5/5 scores in both features and security. Support and reputation came in at 4.9/5, reflecting our interactions with the support team and the host’s strong industry standing. Performance, as you saw above, was solid.

However, prices and capacity scored the lowest at 3.8/5. This is primarily due to Hosting.com's sharp renewal rate increases after the introductory period and the restrictive website limits on lower tiers.

Overall, Hosting.com is an excellent choice if you need strong features and security on a budget, but be ready for higher renewal costs and plan carefully if you need to host multiple sites.

When should you consider Hostinger alternatives?

While Hostinger provides excellent value for budget-conscious users, there are several scenarios where an alternative hosting provider might better serve your needs.

Consider a Hostinger alternative if you:

• Need more from an entry-level plan: Hostinger's tier-one plan has notable gaps. For example, it has no CDN, no staging environment, limited AI tools, and only weekly backups. Alternatives like Bluehost include these features from the start, while DreamHost offers significantly higher website and storage limits.
• Anticipate growth beyond 200K monthly visitors: Hostinger's web hosting caps at 200,000 monthly visits. That includes Hostinger’s Cloud Startup plan, which is technically not regular shared hosting, but Hostinger lists it as a “tier three” web hosting option in its lineup. In contrast, both Bluehost and DreamHost support up to 400,000 on their highest shared tiers, giving you more breathing room before needing to upgrade to other types of hosting (e.g., VPS).
• Value phone support: Hostinger offers only chat support. Both Bluehost (on most plans) and Hosting.com provide 24/7 phone support, making it easier to resolve urgent issues quickly.
• Want to minimize long-term email costs: Hostinger's business email is free for 1 year, then requires a paid plan. Hosting.com includes unlimited email storage on all plans.

Bottom line: The best Hostinger alternatives

Bluehost is our top choice for the best Hostinger alternative, delivering exceptional performance, comprehensive features, and scalability that make it ideal for most website owners.

Each alternative we've highlighted excels in specific areas: Bluehost offers the most complete package with a CDN and staging on all plans, superior traffic capacity, and phone support.

DreamHost stands out for its generous resource allocation at the entry level, plus its rock-solid reliability under sudden heavy traffic.

Lastly, Hosting.com is perfect for limited budgets, offering a cheap introductory rate and free email forever. Just be mindful of the steeper renewal pricing down the road.

FAQs