All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
WP Engine is more expensive than typical WordPress web hosts, doesn’t work with all themes or plugins, and relies on upselling a bit too heavily. These downsides can be annoying, especially for small business users.
If you’re shopping for WordPress hosts, Kinsta is an enterprise-grade WordPress hosting service with equally good features and optimization. The upside is that Kinsta offers more flexibility at a lower price.
Moreover, both SiteGround and Bluehost make good WP Engine alternatives, depending on the circumstances. SiteGround promises the same category of performance at a much more reasonable price. Bluehost is not quite as premium on the service front, but it still offers everything beginners can ask for in a top web hosting service at very pocket-friendly rates.
We cover the best WP Engine alternatives, factoring in pricing, features, and performance based on our in-house testing.
Compare the best WP Engine alternatives of 2025
Kinsta: Best for enterprises
SiteGround: Best for performance
Bluehost: Best for beginners
When should you consider a WP Engine alternative?
Bottom line: The best WP Engine alternatives
FAQs
Best WP Engine Alternatives of 2025
Compare the best WP Engine alternatives of 2025
|
|
| |
| Best for | Best for enterprises | Best for performance | Best for beginners |
| Star rating | |||
| Starting price | Starts at $30/mo | Starts at $2.99/mo | Starts at $2.99/mo |
| Money-back guarantee | Yes — 30 days | Yes — 30 days | Yes — 30 days |
| Uptime guarantee | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.9% |
| Monthly visits | 35K - unlimited | 10K - 400K | Unmetered |
| Number of websites | 1 - 60 | 1 - unlimited | 10 - 100 |
| Storage | 10 GB - 100 GB | 10 GB - 40 GB | 10 GB - 250 GB |
| Free SSL certificate | On all plans | On all plans | On all plans |
| Free domain for a year | On all plans | On all plans | |
| Learn more | Get Kinsta | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
Kinsta: Best for enterprises
What we liked
Google Cloud infrastructure: Kinsta relies on Google Cloud servers to power its cloud hosting infrastructure, benefiting from the best-in-class performance reserved for its premium-tier users.
Developer-friendly setup: With Kinsta, you get SSH access, Git integration, WP-CLI, etc., built directly into the MyKinsta dashboard. Its interface retains its smooth and accessible design, even for complex developer workflows, making life easier for those designing or deploying complex web apps.
WordPress-specific optimizations: Kinsta has features purpose-built for managed WordPress hosting, with many platform-specific optimizations to enable good performance even under pressure. You get built-in Cloudflare CDN, daily automated backups, and server-level caching for improved load times.
What we didn’t like
Still expensive: Similar to WP Engine’s entry-level Startup plan, Kinsta’s pricing is still higher than most competitors, with a starting price of $30/mo. Each plan lets you deploy multiple WordPress websites, which is great for agencies, but it offers far less utility for small businesses.
No domain registration: Since it doesn’t offer domain registration services, Kinsta forces you to buy your website domain from other vendors and complete a few additional verification steps to integrate it with your WordPress installation. That’s a shame, since most competitors offer at least 1 year of free domain registration with automatic integration with your hosting servers.
Test results
Our speed tests across Montreal, Dallas, and Strasbourg showed consistent results with a performance score of 98-99/100. With an average request rate of 4/second and peaking at 7/second, stress tests produced no HTTP errors with 250 virtual users. We also received a perfect uptime report of 100% during our entire test period with Uptime Robot.
![]() |
|
| Uptime | 100% |
| Average response time | 173 ms |
| Did Kinsta pass the stress test? | Yes |
| Learn more | Get Kinsta |
Star rating summary
Kinsta gets top marks for performance and user experience. With its Google Cloud infrastructure and Git integration, it also appeals to developers who test and deploy multiple WordPress sites. While the pricing may be geared toward agencies rather than small businesses, it’s still quite a bit cheaper than WP Engine.
Kinsta earned a solid star rating of 4.4 because it showed great performance, offers easy-to-use, WordPress-focused web hosting, and includes almost all features across all plans.
Kinsta only received a score lower than 4.0 in the value and capacity category because its expensive compared to other web hosting services.
| Decision factor | Weight | Verdict |
| Our experience | 10% | 5.0 |
| Value and capacity | 18% | 3.75 |
| Performance | 20% | 4.5 |
| Features | 25% | 5.0 |
| Security | 20% | 5.0 |
| Support and reputation | 7% | 5.0 |
SiteGround: Best for performance
What we liked
Optimized servers: Like Kinsta, SiteGround runs on Google Cloud infrastructure and offers several server-level optimizations specifically designed for WordPress websites. You also get multi-level server caching, 1-click CDN configuration, and its proprietary “Ultrafast PHP” technology, which claims to boost website speeds by 30% through code optimizations.
Accessible UI: SiteGround’s interface design is extremely accessible, with most optimizations running under the hood with no configuration required. You can install WordPress with a single click using Softaculous and even benefit from its new AI Studio agents for site management.
Website builder: SiteGround offers a WordPress-specific website builder with performance optimizations, now powered by its custom AI Assistant. There’s also Coderick AI, a recently released web app builder that uses simple AI prompts to build complex internal tools such as CRMs, planners, and custom landing pages.
What we didn’t like
Steep renewal pricing: When you sign up for a SiteGround plan, your subscription starts at an introductory rate of $2.99/mo. But after the first billing cycle, prices jump to $17.99/mo. It’s a steep price hike even for the hosting industry, which catches many new users off guard.
Add-on reliance: SiteGround’s pricing structure relies too heavily on add-ons, which can quickly increase subscription costs above base-plan pricing if you need advanced features.
Test results
SiteGround received similar performance scores to Kinsta during speed testing, averaging 98.33/100. However, server response times were a fair bit slower, with an average of 634 ms and a peak of 820 ms during load testing. Still, there were no major HTTP failures with over 250 virtual users within 1 minute.
![]() |
|
| Uptime | 99.863% |
| Average response time | 634 ms |
| Did SiteGround pass the stress test? | Yes |
| Learn more | Get SiteGround |
Star rating summary
If you’re looking for a premium hosting service with a more balanced pricing structure than Kinsta or WP Engine, SiteGround is a good choice. Its pricing, despite the renewal hikes, is more affordable than either provider's and accessible to small businesses that rely on top-notch performance.
SiteGround earned a perfect star rating of 5.0 because of its simple setup process, all-inclusive subscriptions, great performance results, and helpful customer support.
| Decision factor | Weight | Verdict |
| Our experience | 10% | 4.8 |
| Value and capacity | 18% | 5.0 |
| Performance | 20% | 5.0 |
| Features | 25% | 5.0 |
| Security | 20% | 5.0 |
| Support and reputation | 7% | 5.0 |
Bluehost: Best for beginners
What we liked
Endorsed by WordPress.org: Bluehost has received an official seal of approval from the WordPress team for several years in a row, making it a dependable choice for most entry-level users who don’t expect developer features or cutting-edge performance.
Very beginner-friendly: Between its AI website builder for WordPress, Yoast SEO, and WooCommerce integration, and security tools like SiteLock and CodeGuard, Bluehost can take a load off your IT team’s shoulders with most essential functions preconfigured and built in. While some of these features are available only as paid add-ons, it’s still nice to have the option if you run into trouble setting it up yourself.
Affordable entry point: With plans starting at $2.99/mo for the first billing cycle and renewing at just $9.99/mo, Bluehost is the most affordable WordPress host on this list that still has all the features most business users need.
What we didn’t like
Feature exclusions: With Bluehost, things like automated malware removal and domain privacy protection require separate purchases. It keeps the base plan costs low, but expect to pay more if you don’t have all the technical expertise in-house.
Mediocre service: Bluehost has racked up several complaints about its customer service over recent years, mostly due to poor handling of customer queries and refund requests by its agents. While support remains accessible 24/7 through live chat, the quality of interactions can vary a lot depending on which agent you’re paired with.
Test results
Bluehost received a 100/100 performance score across Montreal, Strasbourg, and Dallas. Oddly enough, it outperformed both Kinsta and SiteGround in terms of server response times during our most recent tests. That said, other people may have different experiences. Uptime Robot reported zero downtime during our tests.
![]() |
|
| Uptime | 100% |
| Average response time | 139 ms |
| Did Bluehost pass the stress test? | Yes |
| Learn more | Get Bluehost |
Star rating summary
If you’re a new user looking for an affordable entry point to WordPress-optimized hosting, Bluehost is a good place to start. It’s not as premium as WP Engine, Kinsta, or even SiteGround, with its server-level WordPress optimizations. But in terms of covering the basics well and offering tools to make setup and maintenance easier for your WordPress website, Bluehost does a pretty good job.
Bluehost received a high star rating of 4.8 due to its extensive web hosting features and reliable performance.
Bluehost offers everything you need from a web hosting service, but it's not as affordable as its competitors. We also believe the WordPress installation process could be improved.
| Decision factor | Weight | Verdict |
| Our experience | 10% | 4.5 |
| Value and capacity | 18% | 4.2 |
| Performance | 20% | 5.0 |
| Features | 25% | 5.0 |
| Security | 20% | 5.0 |
| Support and reputation | 7% | 4.8 |
When should you consider a WP Engine alternative?
Among many WordPress pros, WP Engine is the go-to choice for premium managed hosting. While it doesn’t offer anything particularly impressive in terms of raw hardware specs or resource limits, WP Engine excels at server optimization to get the best performance out of your WordPress site.
That said, WP Engine can be expensive and sometimes restrictive. Let’s take a look at some pros and cons:
- Managed hosting with automated security and maintenance
- Enterprise-grade server infrastructure
- Built-in development and staging tools
- Critically acclaimed customer support
- Recent history of legal disputes with WordPress and Automattic
- Plugin restrictions limit flexibility
- Costly even by managed hosting standards
- No email hosting service
If you’re thinking of switching away from WP Engine, chances are that you’ve found yourself in one of the following situations:
- You’re outgrowing shared hosting. WP Engine offers excellent managed hosting for small to medium websites, but it doesn't offer virtual or dedicated servers unless you’re willing to shell out at least $400/mo. Competitors like Bluehost offer managed VPS servers for far less.
- You need more flexibility. If you’re looking for full root access to your server, along with custom configurations and plugins, WP Engine may feel severely limiting. Kinsta and SiteGround both have far fewer restrictions despite being managed hosting providers.
- You have WordPress expertise in-house. WP Engine’s biggest selling point is the quality of support its agents offer. They are WordPress pros who will happily tweak your code and even offer to solve website issues unrelated to its service. But it doesn’t mean much if you already have the required IT expertise in-house. At that point, it’s just an avoidable expense.
Depending on your situation, there are several hosting providers you could look at. Beyond expensive managed WordPress providers, you can also choose standard web hosts as long as they have basic installation support for WordPress, and your IT team can handle the rest.
Bottom line: The best WP Engine alternatives of 2025
Kinsta is our pick for the best WP Engine alternative. It offers a similar category of managed WordPress experience, with excellent support and server optimization. But it does so for a lower price and doesn’t force you to contend with plugin and theme restrictions.
However, Kinsta is still more expensive than other web hosts. Apart from Kinsta, you can look to performance-focused managed hosts like SiteGround or a more typical entry-level hosting service like Bluehost. They’re each fully optimized for WordPress use, with plenty of features to help you take care of maintenance and security without doing it all yourself.
How we test web hosting services
We use our proprietary grading rubric to evaluate web hosts based on performance, ease of use, features, support, and overall value. Our hands-on approach ensures our ratings reflect how each service actually performs in the real world, so you can choose a host with confidence.
Our process starts with signing up for each service and setting up a real website, just like you would. We run page speed, uptime, and stress tests to measure reliability and performance under load. We also explore the dashboard, test security tools, and contact support to see how responsive and helpful it is.
To learn more about how we test, check out our full testing methodology here.
FAQs
What is the best managed WordPress hosting provider?
Beyond WP Engine, there are other managed WordPress hosts, such as Kinsta, Bluehost, and SiteGround, that may better fit your requirements. It all comes down to the level of management you require and your available budget, because managed hosting can mean several things depending on the hosting provider.
What are the best WP Engine alternatives for high-traffic sites?
We recommend either Kinsta or SiteGround if you’re concerned about handling high website traffic. They’re both performance-focused and designed to avoid downtime under pressure.
What features should I consider in a WP Engine alternative?
It depends on why you’re looking for an alternative in the first place. Any standard hosting service with a 1-click WordPress installation should be fine if pricing is your only concern. If you’re more worried about performance or support, managed hosting providers like Kinsta or SiteGround can be a much better fit.


