All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
Several popular pubs, restaurants, and theaters in the UK have banned Meta’s smart glasses, which started as a $299 fashion accessory but have evolved into a full step toward a dystopian 24/7 surveillance society.
While they can be used in exciting and creative ways, their privacy concerns far outweigh their pros. No consent, no phone held up, nothing. Just a pair of glasses that look exactly like everyone else’s, recording your face, your voice, and even your entire conversation.
It’d be fair to say that they’ve unfortunately expanded the horizon of privacy risks to the offline world, which is more concerning in 2026 because of how dangerous AI can be in the wrong hands with your real-time recordings.
Here’s why these glasses are being banned and what you can do to protect your privacy.
Privacy concerns around Meta’s glasses
Meta’s facial recognition plans add to privacy concerns
What can you do to protect yourself
Bottom line
Where are Meta glasses banned
Speaking to The Guardian, Jeremy King, owner of popular London spots such as Simpsons in the Strand, Arlington, and The Park, said that guests shouldn’t wear these glasses as it could lead to an invasion of guests’ privacy.
Similarly, well-known pub chain Wetherspoons has also barred visitors from wearing Meta’s glasses. Tim Martin, the pub’s CEO, said that these glasses impose “surreptitious surveillance” and that one shouldn’t be able to film employees and customers without their consent.
ATG Theatres, which owns Bristol Hippodrome, Edinburgh Playhouse, and other theatres, has also barred viewers from donning these glasses.
A Reddit user reacted to the news and said, “I feel like people would have been excited for this tech 15 years ago, but the world has become more authoritarian and technology more invasive. People already feel like they are observed too much.”
Privacy concerns around Meta’s glasses
On paper, Meta doesn’t want these glasses to become secretive spying cameras. The company claims that it has built a white LED into the glasses that blinks whenever content is being captured.
According to Meta, there’s no hardware switch to turn off the light. If somebody tries to block or modify the LED, the camera reportedly stops working altogether.
However, a report from the Cognitive Privacy Project states that the presence of the LED itself is not the issue, but that most people either miss the small light or assume it’s a Bluetooth indicator.
As per another report from the Purdue Global Law School, these glasses are now being designed to look almost exactly like regular glasses, which can make it very difficult for the general public to tell the difference.
Meta’s smart glasses have come under scrutiny more than once in the recent past. In March 2026, law firm Clarkson Law Firm represented a lawsuit against the tech giant, alleging false and misleading advertising when it comes to these smart glasses.
While Meta argues that its glasses are “designed for privacy, controlled by you” and “built for your privacy,” its privacy policy seems to be far from this narrative.
The lawsuit alleges an incident where Meta’s glasses recorded a woman changing clothes. Several such sexually explicit videos and images were being reviewed by workers at a Kenya-based subcontractor, as found by Swedish papers Svenska Dagbladet and Göteborgs-Posten.
Meta’s own policy states that the company can review your interactions with the AI, which may be automated or manual (by a human).
Plus, if you’re using Meta’s cloud media storage to store content recorded with Meta glasses, the company retains the media for 30 days before it is automatically deleted.
During this time, the media may be used to train Meta’s AI components. That said, deleting photos or videos from your gallery will also automatically delete them from the cloud.
The BBC also reported an incident in May 2026, where a man recorded a woman using his Meta smart glasses without her consent and posted the video on social media, which gained 40,000 views.
The man later asked for money in exchange for removing the video. The victim said that she had no idea that she was being recorded, as the man had no phone or camera, and the whole incident made her feel “humiliated.”
As reported by TMJ, Artis Landon, a former Milwaukee County administrator, is facing three misdemeanor charges, which include secretly recording sexual acts with an ex-partner without her consent using Meta’s smart glasses.
Meta’s facial recognition plans add to privacy concerns
Instead of acknowledging the privacy complaints regarding its smart glasses, Meta silently embedded facial recognition technology into millions of phones through an early June update of the Meta AI app, the companion app for its line of smart glasses.
According to Wired, the code could convert facial images into unique biometric signatures to identify strangers in public and was able to trigger “person-recognized” alerts.
However, after public outcry and backlash, Meta quietly rolled back the feature in another update on June 5. “This quiet deletion of the code does not necessarily equal a permanent change of heart,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said.
What’s more concerning is that Meta didn’t publicly announce the addition of such an important feature but rolled it out silently.
As per a New York Times report published in February, which cited an internal memo from Meta, the company had planned to launch this feature during a “time of political tumult” in the United States.
The report says that Meta planned to launch it during a “dynamic political environment,” when many civil society groups that the company expected to criticize it would have their resources focused on other concerns.
What can you do to protect yourself
If you’re a content creator or regularly use Meta glasses to record videos, make sure you take consent from anyone before recording them or sharing any recorded content.
Furthermore, you could avoid wearing such glasses in intimate settings such as pubs, restaurants, or public gatherings.
On the other hand, if you notice someone filming you through their glasses, you can ask them to stop doing so and request that they delete any content that identifies you without your explicit consent.
However, because it’s so easy to miss when and if you’re being recorded — by not only such smart glasses but also other surveillance tools such as AI security cameras or even your car — it’s wise to have proper protections in place.
After all, even a small leak revealing your email address or phone number is enough to trigger phishing attacks on you.
To stay safe, consider getting an identity theft protection service. These tools can scan known online databases and even the dark web for your personally identifiable information and alert you if they find anything.
Bottom line
With non-consensual recording features and sneaky facial recognition updates, Meta is undoubtedly operating in the gray area with its range of smart glasses.
As a result, many well-known UK establishments, including pubs, restaurants, and theatres, have banned visitors from wearing these glasses — and many more may follow suit and limit the use of such glasses in public settings.
As for individual do’s and don’ts, make sure you only ever use such glasses after getting explicit consent from the people around you. Or, if you find anyone recording you, you can politely request that they don’t, including deleting any content they may have already recorded.