All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
Telemarketers have been around for decades, often cold-calling consumers to make an unwelcome sales pitch. While those kinds of unsolicited calls aren’t new, technology has made it easier for robocallers and telemarketers to reach uninterested consumers. As a result, it can feel like the scourge of unwanted calls is worse than ever before.
Thankfully, the Federal Trade Commission’s Do Not Call Registry offers citizens some relief. Once a phone number is registered to the database, telemarketers are legally required to stop calling that number within 31 days, providing relief from unwanted sales pitches.
Unfortunately, businesses sometimes break this law, as 2.6 million violations were reported to the FTC nationwide last year. That’s an increase of more than 25% from the year before, with the problem growing more in some states than others.
To find out where violations grew fastest (and the rare places where they actually fell), the All About Cookies research team analyzed FTC Do Not Call complaint data for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
What is the National Do Not Call Registry
What counts as a Do Not Call Registry violation
States where Do Not Call complaints surged the most
States where Do Not Call complaints fell
Why Do Not Call complaints are rising
Do Not Call complaints by state (2024–2025)
How to protect yourself from unwanted calls
Methodology
Key findings
- Complaints rose in 49 states (and D.C.) in 2025; only Delaware and Rhode Island saw declines.
- Alaska had the biggest jump at +150.2%, rising from 233 to 583 complaints per 100,000 residents.
- Arizona posted the highest overall complaint rate in the country in 2025, at 1,028 per 100,000 people.
- Nationally, Do Not Call complaints topped 2.6 million in 2025, up more than 25% from 2024.
What is the National Do Not Call Registry?
The National Do Not Call Registry is a completely free service designed to stop unwanted sales calls from actual companies. Once a user adds their phone number to the registry, either online or via a dedicated phone line, that information is added to a list of numbers sent to telemarketers, who then know they are not allowed to call any users on the registry.
Telemarketers have up to 31 days after a number is added to the Do Not Call Registry to stop calling that number, and registration never expires, so users do not need to re-register (exceptions being if a number is disconnected or reassigned). Business numbers cannot be added to the registry, as only personal phone numbers are allowed on the list.
It is important to note that the registry only applies to legitimate, law-abiding businesses and will not prevent all unwanted calls, such as scam or fraud calls.
What counts as a Do Not Call Registry violation
Companies that violate the Do Not Call Registry are subject to fines up to $50,120 per call. Since the Registry was created in 2003, the Federal Trade Commission has collected more than $290 million in court judgments from telemarketers violating the Do Not Call list.
Despite these hefty financial penalties, millions of complaints are filed annually against companies that violate the Do Not Call Registry, with 2.6 million violations reported in 2025. That was an increase of more than 25% compared to 2024, reversing a three-year trend of declining Do Not Call violations.
These violations apply only to calls from actual businesses and specifically to calls that include a sales pitch of some kind. This includes calls where a live salesperson is on the line as well as robocalls, as long as the automated message is trying to sell something. In fact, two-thirds of Do Not Call complaints involve robocalls.
Certain types of phone calls that may feel like they would fall under the Do Not Call Registry are explicitly exempt, as long as they do not involve a sales pitch of any kind. Those exemptions extend to political calls, debt-collection calls, surveys, charity-related calls, and calls that provide information exclusively without selling anything. Any company with which a user has recently conducted business is also allowed to make sales calls, even if that user’s number is on the Do Not Call Registry, but must stop again once asked.
States where Do Not Call complaints surged the most
Across the United States, Do Not Call complaints rose by more than 25% last year, from less than 2.1 million in 2024 to more than 2.6 million in 2025. The increase in Do Not Call complaints wasn't limited to a few outlier regions of the country; it was a near-universal pattern.
In 2024, Alaska had the fewest Do Not Call complaints per 100,000 of any state at just 233 per 100K. In 2025, however, that number jumped to 583 complaints per 100,000 people, an increase of 150%. That year-over-year jump was far and away the largest of any state, though plenty of other states saw massive increases of their own.
Outside Alaska, many of the largest jumps in Do Not Call complaints per capita occurred in the South. Alabama (+58.8%), Louisiana (+56.8%), Mississippi (+55.0%), and Tennessee (+50.0%) all saw complaints rise by at least 50% from the prior year, suggesting a particularly aggressive wave of illegal calling activity in the region. Tennessee, which already had an elevated complaint rate in 2024, crossed the 1,000-per-100,000 threshold in 2025, at 1,017 per 100K. That is the second-highest rate among states, behind Arizona (1,028 per 100,000). Those are the only states with more than 1,000 complaints per 100,000 in the country.
States with the biggest rise in Do Not Call complaints last year
1. Alaska
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2025): 583
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2024): 233
- Change: +150.2%
2. Alabama
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2025): 778
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2024): 490
- Change: +58.8%
3. Louisiana
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2025): 704
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2024): 449
- Change: +56.8%
4. Mississippi
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2025): 727
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2024): 469
- Change: +55.0%
5. Tennessee
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2025): 1,017
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2024): 678
- Change: +50.0%
States where Do Not Call complaints fell
Only two states bucked the national trend, registering fewer complaints per capita in 2025 than in 2024.
Delaware and Rhode Island each saw complaint rates decline last year, though the decreases were relatively modest in both cases. In Delaware, complaints per 100,000 dropped by 11.6%, while in Rhode Island they fell by 6%. Despite those drops, both states still logged hundreds of complaints per 100,000 residents. These decreases could reflect improved enforcement at the state level, shifts in calling patterns, or statistical variation in the relatively small populations of those states.
States with the biggest drops in Do Not Call complaints last year
1. Delaware
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2025): 782
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2024): 885
- Change: -11.6%
2. Rhode Island
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2025): 441
- Complaints per 100,000 people (2024): 469
- Change: -6%
Why Do Not Call complaints are rising
Several forces are likely driving the national surge in reported violations:
- Robocall technology has become cheaper and easier to deploy, allowing bad actors to dial millions of numbers at minimal cost.
- AI voice technology is enabling more convincing scam calls, with synthetic voices that can bypass some screening tools.
- Data brokers continue to sell consumer phone numbers, replenishing calling lists even as individuals register with the FTC.
- Many illegal callers operate internationally, placing them outside the reach of U.S. enforcement.
Even as awareness of data privacy rights grows, enforcement remains difficult. Illegal calls are often routed through overseas servers or spoofed caller ID numbers, making it hard for the FTC to identify and prosecute the originators. The complaint data suggests that rather than deterring violations, increased awareness may simply be prompting more Americans to report them, meaning the problem is becoming more visible even as it continues to grow.
Do Not Call complaints by state (2024–2025)
Below is the full breakdown of Do Not Call complaints per 100,000 residents for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, listed in alphabetical order.
| State | Complaints | Complaints per 100K Population 2025 | Complaints per 100K Population 2024 | Year-Over-Year Change |
| Alabama | 39,335 | 778 | 490 | 58.8% |
| Alaska | 4,280 | 583 | 233 | 150.2% |
| Arizona | 74,752 | 1,028 | 813 | 26.4% |
| Arkansas | 24,063 | 793 | 595 | 33.3% |
| California | 304,497 | 776 | 730 | 6.3% |
| Colorado | 51,924 | 894 | 719 | 24.3% |
| Connecticut | 30,895 | 859 | 639 | 34.4% |
| Delaware | 7,870 | 782 | 885 | -11.6% |
| District of Columbia | 5,392 | 802 | 657 | 22.1% |
| Florida | 204,702 | 933 | 699 | 33.5% |
| Georgia | 89,691 | 829 | 618 | 34.1% |
| Hawaii | 5,675 | 393 | 360 | 9.2% |
| Idaho | 11,183 | 591 | 513 | 15.2% |
| Illinois | 119,697 | 943 | 801 | 17.7% |
| Indiana | 48,652 | 714 | 483 | 47.8% |
| Iowa | 15,926 | 498 | 390 | 27.7% |
| Kansas | 24,043 | 818 | 580 | 41.0% |
| Kentucky | 34,544 | 766 | 531 | 44.3% |
| Louisiana | 32,510 | 704 | 449 | 56.8% |
| Maine | 7,234 | 525 | 488 | 7.6% |
| Maryland | 46,490 | 753 | 680 | 10.7% |
| Massachusetts | 48,190 | 689 | 475 | 45.1% |
| Michigan | 86,552 | 861 | 647 | 33.1% |
| Minnesota | 29,991 | 525 | 512 | 2.5% |
| Mississippi | 21,459 | 727 | 469 | 55.0% |
| Missouri | 42,440 | 688 | 518 | 32.8% |
| Montana | 7,510 | 680 | 460 | 47.8% |
| Nebraska | 15,688 | 798 | 765 | 4.3% |
| Nevada | 30,159 | 960 | 752 | 27.7% |
| New Hampshire | 10,951 | 789 | 717 | 10.0% |
| New Jersey | 82,038 | 885 | 627 | 41.1% |
| New Mexico | 12,224 | 578 | 487 | 18.7% |
| New York | 125,810 | 633 | 521 | 21.5% |
| North Carolina | 92,392 | 873 | 778 | 12.2% |
| North Dakota | 3,310 | 425 | 298 | 42.6% |
| Ohio | 106,378 | 903 | 849 | 6.4% |
| Oklahoma | 34,510 | 864 | 665 | 29.9% |
| Oregon | 25,311 | 597 | 545 | 9.5% |
| Pennsylvania | 85,798 | 661 | 497 | 33.0% |
| Rhode Island | 4,836 | 441 | 469 | -6.0% |
| South Carolina | 39,444 | 757 | 572 | 32.3% |
| South Dakota | 4,902 | 545 | 445 | 22.5% |
| Tennessee | 71,061 | 1,017 | 678 | 50.0% |
| Texas | 228,370 | 770 | 591 | 30.3% |
| Utah | 20,261 | 608 | 460 | 32.2% |
| Vermont | 4,010 | 621 | 567 | 9.5% |
| Virginia | 75,408 | 871 | 763 | 14.2% |
| Washington | 64,053 | 827 | 629 | 31.5% |
| West Virginia | 13,021 | 730 | 611 | 19.5% |
| Wisconsin | 38,926 | 661 | 485 | 36.3% |
| Wyoming | 3,683 | 635 | 426 | 49.1% |
How to protect yourself from unwanted calls
- Remove your personal data from data broker sites: Even with Do Not Call Registry registration, telemarketers can still obtain your number through data brokers who legally sell consumer contact lists. A data removal service can help reduce your exposure over time.
- Use an ad blocker to limit your digital footprint: Robocallers often rely on data brokers that compile personal details from your online activity, app sign-ups, and form submissions. An ad blocker can reduce the number of trackers collecting your data across sites, making it harder for these data brokers to build detailed profiles that may include or be linked to your phone number.
- Consider identity theft protection if you've been targeted: Scam calls are often the opening move in a broader identity theft scheme; an identity theft protection service can monitor your personal information and alert you if your data appears somewhere it shouldn't.
Methodology
To compile this report, the All About Cookies research team analyzed Federal Trade Commission Do Not Call Registry complaint data for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2024, comparing per-capita complaint rates (reported per 100,000 residents) across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Complaint totals and per-capita figures were sourced directly from FTC consumer complaint data using current population estimates.