All About Cookies is an independent, advertising-supported website. Some of the offers that appear on this site are from third-party advertisers from which All About Cookies receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
All About Cookies does not include all financial or credit offers that might be available to consumers nor do we include all companies or all available products. Information is accurate as of the publishing date and has not been provided or endorsed by the advertiser.
The All About Cookies editorial team strives to provide accurate, in-depth information and reviews to help you, our reader, make online privacy decisions with confidence. Here's what you can expect from us:
- All About Cookies makes money when you click the links on our site to some of the products and offers that we mention. These partnerships do not influence our opinions or recommendations. Read more about how we make money.
- Partners are not able to review or request changes to our content except for compliance reasons.
- We aim to make sure everything on our site is up-to-date and accurate as of the publishing date, but we cannot guarantee we haven't missed something. It's your responsibility to double-check all information before making any decision. If you spot something that looks wrong, please let us know.
Best enterprise hosting for beginners
SiteGround is better overall, with an easier user experience, a better backup policy, and a support team that will handle just about anything you need. But then, Bluehost offers most of the same features at a much better price, so it might well be a better match for you.
In this SiteGround vs. Bluehost matchup, we’re here to help you figure out exactly which host is better for your needs.
Which web hosting service has the best core features?
Which web host has the best performance and reliability?
Which web host is the better value?
Which web host has the best security features?
Which web host has the best support and reputation?
Top alternatives
SiteGround vs. Bluehost: Which is better?
FAQs
SiteGround vs. Bluehost review at a glance
- SiteGround: Best enterprise hosting for beginners
- Bluehost: Best for affordable hosting
Our Pick |
| |
| Star rating | ||
| Starting price | Starts at $2.99/mo | Starts at $2.99/mo |
| Money-back guarantee | Yes — 30 days for shared hosting | Yes — 30 days |
| Uptime guarantee | 99.9% | 99.99% |
| Monthly visits | 10K - 400K on shared hosting | 40K - 400K |
| Number of websites | 1 - unlimited | 10 - 100 |
| Storage | 10 GB - 40 GB on shared hosting | 10 GB - 100 GB |
| Free SSL certificate | On all plans | On all plans |
| Free domain for a year | On all plans except cloud | On all plans |
| Learn more | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
SiteGround pros and cons
SiteGround is designed to be the easiest way to get started on enterprise-grade hosting. It offers fantastic WordPress integration, a solid site builder, and a user experience so simple, you’ll wish it were cheaper.
Aside from a few minor issues with server stability, the expense is SiteGround’s main downside.
- Very easy to use
- PCI compliant
- Reputation for reliability in the ecommerce space
- Expensive
- Slightly inconsistent server performance in our testing
Bluehost pros and cons
Bluehost is affordable, performs well, and offers a few more hosting options than SiteGround. It also has great WordPress integration and a custom site builder that was made on top of WordPress.
Some basic features, like domain privacy, however, aren’t available on all plans, and we had a little trouble reaching the support team.
- Good performance for the price
- Affordable plans
- Great WordPress integration
- No domain privacy on the cheapest plan
- Difficulties communicating with support
Which web hosting service has the best core features?
It’s a close one, but SiteGround wins here.
Our Pick |
| |
| Websites per account | 1 - unlimited | 10 - 100 |
| Storage available | 10 GB - 40 GB on shared hosting | 10 GB - 100 GB |
| Bandwidth | Unmetered | Unmetered |
| Monthly visits | 10K - 400K on shared hosting | 40K - 400K |
| Staging environment | Starting at the GrowBig plan | On all plans |
| Migration assistance | On all plans | Paid service |
| Unlimited | Unlimited | |
| Control panel | On all plans | On all plans |
| Website builder | On all plans | On all plans |
| Hosting types available | Shared / site builder / WordPress / WooCommerce / cloud | Shared / WordPress / WooCommerce / managed VPS / dedicated |
| Learn more | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
Now, Bluehost does have more types of web hosting available, and that’s certainly something to consider. You can also get more storage, which is nice.
But SiteGround’s core experience is so smooth, so carefully designed, that many users will never need to change a setting, just build a site. Also, for people who don’t want to use WordPress, having a separate site builder is a bonus.
Bluehost’s core features are pretty solid, and the site builder that’s built on top of WordPress is cool, but it also means one less choice for the end user. However, you can install other CMS options if you know how. It also loses points for not having free migration assistance, which can be a big deal for beginners.
Which web host has the best performance and reliability?
This is basically a tie, as both services performed reasonably well in our tests, with quite stable server performance, solid First Contentful Paint (the time it takes for your site to start loading) times, and reasonably good Last Contentful Paint (when your site finishes loading) times.
|
| |
| Uptime guarantee | 99.9% | 99.99% |
| Tested uptime | 99.863% | 100% |
| Average performance score | 98.3 | 100 |
| Average FCP | 0.36 s | 0.43 s |
| Average LCP | 1.0 s | 0.63 s |
| Stress test | Pass | Pass |
| HTTP failures | None | None |
| Learn more | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
Our SiteGround testing could have gone a little better overall, though it didn’t perform badly; Bluehost definitely got better site performance scores. But … in any case, things like the site performance score and LCP can be affected by the way the site is built, and SiteGround’s average FCP was better.
But Bluehost's average server response time was nice and low, and it handled the stress test well. SiteGround’s average server response time was more unstable, but it handled the stress test quite a bit better.
Which web host is the better value?
Bluehost wins here because it offers pretty much the same basic features for lower prices. Can’t really argue with that.
|
Our Pick
| |
| Price range | $2.99-$7.99/mo | $2.99-$13.99/mo |
| Best value plan | StartUp for $2.99/mo | Starter for $2.99/mo |
| Money-back guarantee | Yes — 30 days for shared hosting | Yes — 30 days |
| Free domain for a year | On all plans | On all plans |
| Free CDN | On all plans | On all plans |
| Free SSL | On all plans | On all plans |
| Learn more | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
SiteGround plans
SiteGround’s pricing plans mostly just add more resources, with very few features being restricted to the higher tiers. It’d be nice if “more optimized PHP” wasn’t one of those higher-tier features, but that’s how it goes. Every plan comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
- StartUp: 1 website, 10 GB storage, 10K monthly visits, daily backup, managed WordPress hosting or site builder, free CDN, caching, free WP migration, WP-CLI, and SSH
- GrowBig: Unlimited websites, 20 GB storage, 100K monthly visits, adds staging, and more optimized PHP
- GoGeek: Unlimited websites, 50 GB storage, 400K monthly visits, adds Git, white labeling for agencies, free private DNS, and priority support
Bluehost plans
Bluehost’s pricing plans follow the traditional structure, where paying for higher tiers gets you more server resources and a lot more features. Fortunately, most of the essential features are available in the cheapest plan, so it’s not like you’re forced to upgrade if you don’t want to. Every plan also comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
- Starter: 10 websites, 10 GB storage, 40K visits per month, site builder tools, free domain for 1 year, free SSL, free CDN, chat support, WordPress optimizations, WP-CLI, SSH, email marketing features, and weekly backups
- Business: 50 websites, 50 GB storage, 200K visits per month, adds domain privacy, and malware detection/removal (on top of the regular malware scans)
- eCommerce essentials: 100 websites, 100 GB storage, 400K visits per month, and adds commerce tools, including WooCommerce Auto-Install
Which web host has the best security features?
SiteGround wins, but not by a whole lot.
Our Pick |
| |
| Malware scanning | ||
| Firewall protection | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Backup frequency | Daily | Weekly |
| Learn more | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
Both hosts offer a pretty great suite of security features, including malware scanning to keep your site virus free, firewalls to help keep hackers out, DDoS protection to keep botnets from taking your site down, and automatic backups.
SiteGround ekes out the win by providing daily automatic backups as opposed to Bluehost’s weekly backup schedule. It’s that simple. Daily is better.
Which web host has the best support and reputation?
SiteGround takes the win here, with great support and a fantastic reputation overall.
Our Pick |
| |
| 24/7 customer support | ||
| Support options | Live chat, phone, online guides | Live chat, phone, online guides |
| Trustpilot score | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| G2 rating | 4.2 | 3.4 |
| Capterra rating | 4.6 | 3.6 |
| Learn more | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
While both hosts have a decent set of options to contact them, SiteGround handled that a bit better in our testing. Bluehost’s chatbot gave us a little bit of a runaround before we were able to talk to a person, which is never ideal.
And when it comes to reputation, SiteGround scores higher across all the major review sites. Reviews on Reddit are also weighted in favor of SiteGround customers, who seem to be quite satisfied. Meanwhile, many Bluehost customers report issues with customer service and significant downtime.
Top alternatives
Bluehost and SiteGround are just two of the best web hosting services we’ve tested. SiteGround is the cream of the crop, but many businesses starting out may need hosting that’s budget friendly. If Bluehost doesn’t fit the bill, we recommend these tested alternatives:
If you need a web host with affordable prices and great feature sets, Hostinger should be your first stop.
If you’re looking for cheaper enterprise-ready hosting, IONOS is a good option, too.
Kinsta is another premium WordPress host like SiteGround, but the tradeoff for usability is the price tag.
SiteGround vs. Bluehost: Which is better?
SiteGround is better overall, though Bluehost’s prices may still present an attractive option to many.
Our Pick
|
| |
| Value | ||
| Core features | ||
| Performance and reliability | ||
| Security | ||
| Support and reputation | ||
| Learn more | Get SiteGround | Get Bluehost |
SiteGround gives you the dead-simple yet enterprise-ready host that you (well, some of you) have dreamed of. It’s so well regarded that their customers seem to love it despite the price.
But then Bluehost also offers solid WordPress integration and generally decent hosting features at much more affordable prices. Those looking for a cheap way to start a website might go for Bluehost instead.
How we test web hosting services
We use our proprietary grading rubric to evaluate web hosts based on performance, ease of use, features, support, and overall value. Our hands-on approach ensures our ratings reflect how each service actually performs in the real world, so you can choose a host with confidence.
Our process starts with signing up for each service and setting up a real website, just like you would. We run page speed, uptime, and stress tests to measure reliability and performance under load. We also explore the dashboard, test security tools, and contact support to see how responsive and helpful it is.
To learn more about how we test, check out our full testing methodology here.
FAQs
Is SiteGround a Russian company?
SiteGround is not a Russian company. It was founded in Bulgaria, and its headquarters are there as well.
What are the pros and cons of SiteGround?
SiteGround is easy to use, offers plenty of options for people who want to control their hosting package, and has easy defaults for people who’d rather just make a website and be done with it. It also offers fantastic service. The main downsides are the price of SiteGround's plans, which are not cheap, and a bit of server instability we observed during testing.
Is Bluehost an Israeli company?
Bluehost is not an Israeli company. It is headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, and was founded in Utah.
What are the cons of Bluehost?
The cons of Bluehost aren’t too bad, but worth considering all the same. We had a little trouble reaching the support team during our review, for example. Also, basic features like domain privacy aren’t included in the cheapest plan.